Oppose not much EV.
Tomer T (
talk) 12:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I edited photo caption and added a little encyclopedic informative note. So dear
Tomer T! would you please review your notion? thanks a million.
Alborzagros (
talk) 13:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I'm sorry- this has already been removed from some of the articles, and I suspect it will be removed from others. There are many, many shots like this, and it doesn't really tell us much from an encyclopedic perspective. Also, the second tree (on the right) detracts from the main subject, and some of the outer-branches of the main tree are not in the frame.
J Milburn (
talk) 22:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose Issues with EV. First, the focus is on the tree, so the image has low ev in geographical articles since you cannot see the landscape. In the article about the tree species, you don't get a good look at the detail in the tree itself because of the sunset effect, so ev is lower in that respect. SpencerT♦C 07:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose A great commons FPC, but the EV is simply not there. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 21:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Wingtipvortex and Spencer. Also, the sunset effect was nothing because the tree blocked it.
Medirantalk 11:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose not much EV.
Tomer T (
talk) 12:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I edited photo caption and added a little encyclopedic informative note. So dear
Tomer T! would you please review your notion? thanks a million.
Alborzagros (
talk) 13:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I'm sorry- this has already been removed from some of the articles, and I suspect it will be removed from others. There are many, many shots like this, and it doesn't really tell us much from an encyclopedic perspective. Also, the second tree (on the right) detracts from the main subject, and some of the outer-branches of the main tree are not in the frame.
J Milburn (
talk) 22:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose Issues with EV. First, the focus is on the tree, so the image has low ev in geographical articles since you cannot see the landscape. In the article about the tree species, you don't get a good look at the detail in the tree itself because of the sunset effect, so ev is lower in that respect. SpencerT♦C 07:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose A great commons FPC, but the EV is simply not there. --
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 21:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Wingtipvortex and Spencer. Also, the sunset effect was nothing because the tree blocked it.
Medirantalk 11:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)reply