Support as nominator —
Chris H 13:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong support. Excellent quality, adds greatly to the article.
Amphy 16:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Very Strong Support This is a fantastic picture. There is a truely remarkable depth of detail. It is both aesthetically pleasing and scientifically fascinating. The Bok globules, the lobes of Eta Carinae, the visceral impression of the violence associated with the birth and the death of stars. (Particularly very large O-type stars.) This is one of the best astronomical images of all time. (Although that is a large list.)
Calen716 18:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC) —
Calen716 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Support Stunning and encyclopedic.Pedro |
Chat 10:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support It's utterly gorgeous. I can't find a flaw with this. --
Paul 20:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I agree with Paul ^^^
Flubeca 20:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
An absolutely astonishing picture and I happily Support. But, this is a bit embarrassing, where is the star in the picture?
Kinggimble 23:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I added some content to the page that sould help.
Chris H 01:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support, as if my vote is really needed...per above. --Tewy 01:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support This just looks amazing :O.. good res aswell. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Yzmo (
talk •
contribs).
Support ... --
Arad 21:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Ohhhh...
8thstar 15:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support Nicest photo I've ever seen...amazing subject material, highly encyclpedic, beautiful resolution.
Theonlyedge 00:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - I love these space images... --
Valley2city₪‽ 16:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. Yep, no way anybody could not find this enchanting and mystifying... who would have thought that space could be so beautiful? Although, having said that I find the stars beautiful in themselves... but yes, this is something altogether different. --
Vaelta 08:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I am...at...a loss...for...words.... Breathtaking.
J Are you green? 01:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I also recommend including a link to
the zoomable version wherever this is placed. It shows the true power of astronomical cameras. Also, it's worth noting that this is Hubble AND CTIO. The people responsible for the image (Nathan Smith, John Bally, and others) should probably be credited. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Keflavich (
talk •
contribs).
Support-until-there-can-be-no-more-support If this doesn't get an FP status, I'll change my name to George W. Bush.
BeefRendang 14:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Sorry, last time I checked, this wouldn't qualify for Featured picture.
National Geographic is 3 blocks down. · AndonicOTalk 18:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support To my mind, this is as pleasing aesthetically and as valuable encyclopedically as
Image:Polarlicht 2.jpg (which illustrates a wholly different subject, to be sure, but a similarity to which one must perceive), which earned
Commons POY in 2006.
Joe 02:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy support I think it's fair to say there is a consensus here.
Noclip 17:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator —
Chris H 13:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong support. Excellent quality, adds greatly to the article.
Amphy 16:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Very Strong Support This is a fantastic picture. There is a truely remarkable depth of detail. It is both aesthetically pleasing and scientifically fascinating. The Bok globules, the lobes of Eta Carinae, the visceral impression of the violence associated with the birth and the death of stars. (Particularly very large O-type stars.) This is one of the best astronomical images of all time. (Although that is a large list.)
Calen716 18:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC) —
Calen716 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Support Stunning and encyclopedic.Pedro |
Chat 10:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support It's utterly gorgeous. I can't find a flaw with this. --
Paul 20:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I agree with Paul ^^^
Flubeca 20:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
An absolutely astonishing picture and I happily Support. But, this is a bit embarrassing, where is the star in the picture?
Kinggimble 23:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I added some content to the page that sould help.
Chris H 01:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support, as if my vote is really needed...per above. --Tewy 01:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support This just looks amazing :O.. good res aswell. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Yzmo (
talk •
contribs).
Support ... --
Arad 21:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Ohhhh...
8thstar 15:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Support Nicest photo I've ever seen...amazing subject material, highly encyclpedic, beautiful resolution.
Theonlyedge 00:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - I love these space images... --
Valley2city₪‽ 16:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. Yep, no way anybody could not find this enchanting and mystifying... who would have thought that space could be so beautiful? Although, having said that I find the stars beautiful in themselves... but yes, this is something altogether different. --
Vaelta 08:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I am...at...a loss...for...words.... Breathtaking.
J Are you green? 01:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support I also recommend including a link to
the zoomable version wherever this is placed. It shows the true power of astronomical cameras. Also, it's worth noting that this is Hubble AND CTIO. The people responsible for the image (Nathan Smith, John Bally, and others) should probably be credited. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Keflavich (
talk •
contribs).
Support-until-there-can-be-no-more-support If this doesn't get an FP status, I'll change my name to George W. Bush.
BeefRendang 14:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Sorry, last time I checked, this wouldn't qualify for Featured picture.
National Geographic is 3 blocks down. · AndonicOTalk 18:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support To my mind, this is as pleasing aesthetically and as valuable encyclopedically as
Image:Polarlicht 2.jpg (which illustrates a wholly different subject, to be sure, but a similarity to which one must perceive), which earned
Commons POY in 2006.
Joe 02:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy support I think it's fair to say there is a consensus here.
Noclip 17:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)reply