Oppose – Although the composition may be aesthetically pleasing, distance to subject, excessive sky and dominating tree reduce EV to nil.
Sca (
talk) 23:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose passes as FP on Commons due to its quality, but the EV is low. SST
flyer 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn ok guys, I got the point and I'll withdraw the picture. This was my first active nomination here (as my primary playground is Commons). I guess I just didn't really understand the concept of EV as defined here on wp. Thanks! --
Martin Falbisoner (
talk) 05:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Although the composition may be aesthetically pleasing, distance to subject, excessive sky and dominating tree reduce EV to nil.
Sca (
talk) 23:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose passes as FP on Commons due to its quality, but the EV is low. SST
flyer 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Request withdrawn ok guys, I got the point and I'll withdraw the picture. This was my first active nomination here (as my primary playground is Commons). I guess I just didn't really understand the concept of EV as defined here on wp. Thanks! --
Martin Falbisoner (
talk) 05:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)reply