From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mount Vernon Estate Mansion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2016 at 13:42:11 (UTC)

Original – Mount Vernon Estate Mansion
Reason
Already FP on commons, 2nd place in WLM 2013 US, high EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Mount Vernon
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Martin Falbisoner
  • Support as nominatorMartin Falbisoner ( talk) 13:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - Too much sky. —  Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose – Although the composition may be aesthetically pleasing, distance to subject, excessive sky and dominating tree reduce EV to nil. Sca ( talk) 23:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose passes as FP on Commons due to its quality, but the EV is low. SST flyer 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  •  Request withdrawn ok guys, I got the point and I'll withdraw the picture. This was my first active nomination here (as my primary playground is Commons). I guess I just didn't really understand the concept of EV as defined here on wp. Thanks! -- Martin Falbisoner ( talk) 05:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • @ Martin Falbisoner, check out Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture for an idea of what has generally fit the bill here on En-WIki. —  Chris Woodrich ( talk) 06:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks! -- Martin Falbisoner ( talk) 06:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Not Promoted --SST flyer 07:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Withdrawn by nominator. SST flyer 07:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mount Vernon Estate Mansion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2016 at 13:42:11 (UTC)

Original – Mount Vernon Estate Mansion
Reason
Already FP on commons, 2nd place in WLM 2013 US, high EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Mount Vernon
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Martin Falbisoner
  • Support as nominatorMartin Falbisoner ( talk) 13:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - Too much sky. —  Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose – Although the composition may be aesthetically pleasing, distance to subject, excessive sky and dominating tree reduce EV to nil. Sca ( talk) 23:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose passes as FP on Commons due to its quality, but the EV is low. SST flyer 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  •  Request withdrawn ok guys, I got the point and I'll withdraw the picture. This was my first active nomination here (as my primary playground is Commons). I guess I just didn't really understand the concept of EV as defined here on wp. Thanks! -- Martin Falbisoner ( talk) 05:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • @ Martin Falbisoner, check out Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture for an idea of what has generally fit the bill here on En-WIki. —  Chris Woodrich ( talk) 06:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks! -- Martin Falbisoner ( talk) 06:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Not Promoted --SST flyer 07:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Withdrawn by nominator. SST flyer 07:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook