Oppose - After reading Debivort's comment and looking again, I've reconsidered. It does look overcooked. --TotoBaggins 15:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support borderless high-resolution version. --
Brandспойт 20:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)reply
ack! oppose - looks like it has been oversharpened / contrast boosted - with a majority of the distinguishable stars spread out to more than one pixel each, and running together. Too many stars saturated out, I suspect heavy handed post-processing.
Debivort 23:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Debivort. --
Moondigger 00:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose - After reading Debivort's comment and looking again, I've reconsidered. It does look overcooked. --TotoBaggins 15:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Support borderless high-resolution version. --
Brandспойт 20:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)reply
ack! oppose - looks like it has been oversharpened / contrast boosted - with a majority of the distinguishable stars spread out to more than one pixel each, and running together. Too many stars saturated out, I suspect heavy handed post-processing.
Debivort 23:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Debivort. --
Moondigger 00:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)reply