Support as nominator —
Skillz187 19:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Support This is a great and beautiful picture showing in detail the Miami Skyline.
Arigont 15:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Somehow, this nom never made it to the main FPC page. Listing it now, with alternatives.
MER-C 06:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. No question the miamitom one is the highest quality. The alternatives with and without the foreground are hazy and indistinct and even unfocused at the edges, and one has a distracting island in the foreground, whereas the other seems to eliminate the coastal nature of Miami altogether. --
Dhartung |
Talk 11:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all The original is blurred and indistinct and the other two are hazy as well. The original is slightly better, but still not close.
Matt Deres 14:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all - No doubt this a beautiful landscape but the technical quality is terrible, sorry.
Alvesgaspar 20:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
IP users do not have suffrage. Please sign in if you wish to vote.
Cacophony 19:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose alternatives They're way too small and washed-out. The original might work, but that horribly distorted crane kind of ruins it. Maybe if it was clearer in the original, and we could get a less downsampled version?
Adam Cuerdentalk 06:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all - Poor quality. They are all blurry.
die2u2 (
talk) 01:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Not promoted MER-C 02:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator —
Skillz187 19:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Support This is a great and beautiful picture showing in detail the Miami Skyline.
Arigont 15:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Somehow, this nom never made it to the main FPC page. Listing it now, with alternatives.
MER-C 06:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Support. No question the miamitom one is the highest quality. The alternatives with and without the foreground are hazy and indistinct and even unfocused at the edges, and one has a distracting island in the foreground, whereas the other seems to eliminate the coastal nature of Miami altogether. --
Dhartung |
Talk 11:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all The original is blurred and indistinct and the other two are hazy as well. The original is slightly better, but still not close.
Matt Deres 14:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all - No doubt this a beautiful landscape but the technical quality is terrible, sorry.
Alvesgaspar 20:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
IP users do not have suffrage. Please sign in if you wish to vote.
Cacophony 19:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose alternatives They're way too small and washed-out. The original might work, but that horribly distorted crane kind of ruins it. Maybe if it was clearer in the original, and we could get a less downsampled version?
Adam Cuerdentalk 06:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose all - Poor quality. They are all blurry.
die2u2 (
talk) 01:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Not promoted MER-C 02:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply