Mediæval Micky
Indeed its mildly interesting that is bears such a resemblence to a modern day cartoon character, but it doesn't meet FP standards. It adds little if anything to the article it's in ( Mickey Mouse), it's neither striking, stunning or beautiful, and it weighs in at a less than acceptable 243x263px. (NB it was promoted before voting was introduced). ed g2s • talk 12:13, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. ed g2s • talk 12:13, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support, good catch. -- [[User:Solitude| Solitude\ talk]] 14:30, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. It doesn't add significant value to Mickey Mouse, the only article it is associated with at this time. - [[User:Bevo| Bevo]] 16:55, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. Janderk 09:02, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. Definitely not up to specs. -- Barfooz 06:28, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Mediæval Micky
Indeed its mildly interesting that is bears such a resemblence to a modern day cartoon character, but it doesn't meet FP standards. It adds little if anything to the article it's in ( Mickey Mouse), it's neither striking, stunning or beautiful, and it weighs in at a less than acceptable 243x263px. (NB it was promoted before voting was introduced). ed g2s • talk 12:13, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. ed g2s • talk 12:13, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support, good catch. -- [[User:Solitude| Solitude\ talk]] 14:30, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. It doesn't add significant value to Mickey Mouse, the only article it is associated with at this time. - [[User:Bevo| Bevo]] 16:55, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. Janderk 09:02, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support delisting. Definitely not up to specs. -- Barfooz 06:28, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)