Support as nominator --
SBORK 06:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral I like the image but I'm not convinced of high EV. Maybe if the article was more extensive or the caption was more detailed, I could be convinced.
Pine 08:59, August 25, 2011
Support Nice image, EV is sufficient for the river's mouth, although a bit of river to the left is out.
Brandmeistert 23:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Support: Sharp image, contrast is good. EV value could be improved, but it is there. Perhaps an expansion of the host article?
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 15:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not too knowledgeable on the glacier itself, though I thought this image might add to the description in the article. I've also uploaded a
wider angle panorama if that's more suitable/interesting.
SBORK 16:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
That looks nice too. Maybe you could suggest it as an ALT.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 16:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Not sure if I need to do something official for that? I guess it would be possible to make a more interesting caption by combining some information about
the glacier and
the river.
SBORK 02:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Good clear image I agree with the EV being improved and it misses out a bit of the image on the left but its a good image anyway
Jamesrules90 (
talk) 16:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator --
SBORK 06:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Neutral I like the image but I'm not convinced of high EV. Maybe if the article was more extensive or the caption was more detailed, I could be convinced.
Pine 08:59, August 25, 2011
Support Nice image, EV is sufficient for the river's mouth, although a bit of river to the left is out.
Brandmeistert 23:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Support: Sharp image, contrast is good. EV value could be improved, but it is there. Perhaps an expansion of the host article?
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 15:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not too knowledgeable on the glacier itself, though I thought this image might add to the description in the article. I've also uploaded a
wider angle panorama if that's more suitable/interesting.
SBORK 16:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
That looks nice too. Maybe you could suggest it as an ALT.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 16:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Not sure if I need to do something official for that? I guess it would be possible to make a more interesting caption by combining some information about
the glacier and
the river.
SBORK 02:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Good clear image I agree with the EV being improved and it misses out a bit of the image on the left but its a good image anyway
Jamesrules90 (
talk) 16:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)reply