Somewhat high res. decent sharpness, on a side note, does anyone else have trouble getting the commons servers images to match the ones that you see on your computers before they go online? I have uploaded four versions of
this and the contrast on colors have been wrong in all of them, very frustrating. And could you also vote on my church steeple nom, Oppose or support or whatever but some kind of response would be great.
Oppose, it's nicely informative and clear, but the head-on composition lacks special interest, and the low height from which it was taken leaves the vertical perspective too drastic. It might be a touch overexposed too; the building looks somewhat washed out in the harsh sunlight. It also looks like the top of someone's head was right under your camera in the bottom right corner of the photograph.
Postdlf01:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Somewhat high res. decent sharpness, on a side note, does anyone else have trouble getting the commons servers images to match the ones that you see on your computers before they go online? I have uploaded four versions of
this and the contrast on colors have been wrong in all of them, very frustrating. And could you also vote on my church steeple nom, Oppose or support or whatever but some kind of response would be great.
Oppose, it's nicely informative and clear, but the head-on composition lacks special interest, and the low height from which it was taken leaves the vertical perspective too drastic. It might be a touch overexposed too; the building looks somewhat washed out in the harsh sunlight. It also looks like the top of someone's head was right under your camera in the bottom right corner of the photograph.
Postdlf01:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)reply