This picture doesn't appear in any articles. Please fix this.
MER-C 09:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Conditional Support. If this high quality and informative image is placed in an appropriate article, I will support it. NauticaShades 14:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. The appropriate article, of course, is
Romalea guttata, but the current taxobox picture is very good and shows a single, whole specimen. There is a gallery at the bottom, but we should probably find a more prominent place to display this image. Are these grasshoppers mating? If so, it would be a good image for the "Reproduction" section of
grasshopper.--
ragesoss (
talk) 20:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. They are almost certainly mating.
Tomfriedel (
talk) 01:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support. It now appears in
Grasshopper (although the image formatting in that article is horrible, mainly because of the taxobox) and
Romalea guttata (but just in a gallery).--
ragesoss (
talk) 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply
This picture doesn't appear in any articles. Please fix this.
MER-C 09:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Conditional Support. If this high quality and informative image is placed in an appropriate article, I will support it. NauticaShades 14:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. The appropriate article, of course, is
Romalea guttata, but the current taxobox picture is very good and shows a single, whole specimen. There is a gallery at the bottom, but we should probably find a more prominent place to display this image. Are these grasshoppers mating? If so, it would be a good image for the "Reproduction" section of
grasshopper.--
ragesoss (
talk) 20:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment. They are almost certainly mating.
Tomfriedel (
talk) 01:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support. It now appears in
Grasshopper (although the image formatting in that article is horrible, mainly because of the taxobox) and
Romalea guttata (but just in a gallery).--
ragesoss (
talk) 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)reply