Loch Lomond landscape

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2020 at 16:45:21 (UTC)

Reason

High quality lead image. We have a FP from 2006 here with a different composition, but it has not been in the main article since mid-2006. The nom image shows more of the landscape and is a better lead image, with more pixels.

Articles in which this image appears

Loch Lomond, National scenic area (Scotland), National scenic area

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Colin

• Support as nominator – Bammesk ( talk) 16:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment - It's really not too bad. My only issue with it is that it crops half the loch. If you look at the image I attached, you can see how the loch continues for a long way. I'd happily support a wide panorama encompasing what these two photos capture into one seamless photo. Difficult, but potentially exemplary. -- Veggies ( talk) 07:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Veggies, the nom image shows the main section and 11 of about 20 miles. It's impossible to show the entire stream with the hills and turns. The other image shows 2 more miles (not "the rest" as your caption says). It is not a deal breaker IMO. Bammesk ( talk) 16:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• I'm just saying: seeing that the valley continues on for a long way in the other direction, I would prefer a full panorama. It would present the loch in the most appealing, encyclopedic fashion. -- Veggies ( talk) 22:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Not Promoted -- Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC) reply