Support as nominator --
Theparties (
talk) 21:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose this version. It's scanned from a book, meaning that detail has been lost. Any scans of the actual painting? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I think that would be difficult to find since it was lost up until recently. I tried Google but what I got was the same quality.--
Theparties (
talk) 23:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Crisco. There may not be a better scan of this particular painting out there right now, but that doesn't mean that we should promote a substandard one.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator --
Theparties (
talk) 21:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose this version. It's scanned from a book, meaning that detail has been lost. Any scans of the actual painting? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
I think that would be difficult to find since it was lost up until recently. I tried Google but what I got was the same quality.--
Theparties (
talk) 23:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Crisco. There may not be a better scan of this particular painting out there right now, but that doesn't mean that we should promote a substandard one.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)reply