Support, although it deserves a color shot.
Brandmeistertalk 13:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Three years stable. A bit soft and grainy, but very eye-catching. I'm not sure what more EV can be added: she has red lips and is fair skinned. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Too stylized for an encyclopedia article, IMO. A color photo with less dramatic lighting would be preferable.
Kaldari (
talk) 07:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Nice pic and to me it has enough EV.
Godhulii 1985 (
talk) 13:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Support a little soft but ok given the year of the photo. --Pine✉ 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Basically per Kaldari. It's a little too bedroom and too posed glamor shot for how it is placed as the lead image of her biography.
TCO (
talk) 20:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
This pose is not unusual for studio photography of an actress or singer. I see your point that it's posed and a glamor shot but in this case I think that's acceptable, although I might not use it as the lead image for the article. --Pine✉ 23:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Support, although it deserves a color shot.
Brandmeistertalk 13:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Three years stable. A bit soft and grainy, but very eye-catching. I'm not sure what more EV can be added: she has red lips and is fair skinned. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Too stylized for an encyclopedia article, IMO. A color photo with less dramatic lighting would be preferable.
Kaldari (
talk) 07:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Nice pic and to me it has enough EV.
Godhulii 1985 (
talk) 13:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Support a little soft but ok given the year of the photo. --Pine✉ 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Basically per Kaldari. It's a little too bedroom and too posed glamor shot for how it is placed as the lead image of her biography.
TCO (
talk) 20:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply
This pose is not unusual for studio photography of an actress or singer. I see your point that it's posed and a glamor shot but in this case I think that's acceptable, although I might not use it as the lead image for the article. --Pine✉ 23:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)reply