Weak support. Top left is not optimal, and this could have been taken at a better time of day. But wow, I've never seen a place like this before. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠
07:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Question I like the colors on this and the EV is good, but I see something that looks like a strange blurry outline directly above the rock formations near the top of the photo. Is that a compression artifact? --Pine✉00:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Top far left is totally blown out and just to the right of that is a greenish spot that looks like either a compression artifact or some sort of reflection, in either case it's distracting but only really noticeable if you're looking closely at that section of the image. Cat-fivetc ----
05:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Support while this photo could be better technically I think it's good enough for now. We can do a D&R later if we get something better. The photo's subject is impressive. --Pine✉09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)reply
On the short side it is only about 1000 high, but on the long side it is about 3800 wide and I view this as an acceptable tradeoff. --Pine✉00:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak support. Top left is not optimal, and this could have been taken at a better time of day. But wow, I've never seen a place like this before. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠
07:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Question I like the colors on this and the EV is good, but I see something that looks like a strange blurry outline directly above the rock formations near the top of the photo. Is that a compression artifact? --Pine✉00:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Top far left is totally blown out and just to the right of that is a greenish spot that looks like either a compression artifact or some sort of reflection, in either case it's distracting but only really noticeable if you're looking closely at that section of the image. Cat-fivetc ----
05:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Support while this photo could be better technically I think it's good enough for now. We can do a D&R later if we get something better. The photo's subject is impressive. --Pine✉09:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)reply
On the short side it is only about 1000 high, but on the long side it is about 3800 wide and I view this as an acceptable tradeoff. --Pine✉00:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)reply