Johan Theorin
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2013 at 17:32:54 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nice and interesting portrait, nice expression. High EV and quality. I noticed the shadow, but I don't think it detracts from the image, but adds to its dramatically.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Johan Theorin
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others (Where do writers go?)
- Creator
- ArildV
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 17:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yes, the composition is nice but the depth of field is poor. For a portrait like this, his clothes should be in focus. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with the nom. I just think there's way too much headroom. (edit conflict) I don't see why his clothes have to be in focus. The article isn't discussing his clothes. – Kerαunoςcopia◁
gala
xies
18:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Added alternative. Tomer T ( talk) 18:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support Alternative Like the cropped top better. DOF is fine. -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I simply can't make up my mind on this one. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 18:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 17:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Johan Theorin
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2013 at 17:32:54 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nice and interesting portrait, nice expression. High EV and quality. I noticed the shadow, but I don't think it detracts from the image, but adds to its dramatically.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Johan Theorin
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others (Where do writers go?)
- Creator
- ArildV
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 17:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yes, the composition is nice but the depth of field is poor. For a portrait like this, his clothes should be in focus. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with the nom. I just think there's way too much headroom. (edit conflict) I don't see why his clothes have to be in focus. The article isn't discussing his clothes. – Kerαunoςcopia◁
gala
xies
18:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Added alternative. Tomer T ( talk) 18:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support Alternative Like the cropped top better. DOF is fine. -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I simply can't make up my mind on this one. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 18:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 17:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)