Support as nominator --
Tomer T (
talk) 11:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support There is a decent amount of EV in this image. Per nom, angle is good. Image is soft at full resolution; it seems it was focused on the other side of the fence. Good composition otherwise.--
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 17:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Quality is alright; the perspective is good for EV as it emphasizes the extent of the barrier. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠05:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose this has focus problems on the far left and also loses focus into the distance. I would support this same shot if we could get it without focus problems. Pine✉ 08:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support. Good quality and unique display. It got me to look close into it.
ComputerJA (
talk) 20:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Neutral It's focused on the fence, not the road - that's a good thing! However this is only f/5.6 and didn't need the high shutter speed used, so greater depth was possible, and I cannot support. --
99of9 (
talk) 00:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
It was not shooted by a professional photographer.
Tomer T (
talk) 09:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I am not either, so this is not professional advice ;-). But I do think that FP should be the best we've got - often that is achieved by amateurs, but sometimes it's not. --
99of9 (
talk) 10:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
*Support - from my perspective having had a look I don't think the technical flaws have much of an impact on the image's encyclopedic value and don't outweigh it. Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 18:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator --
Tomer T (
talk) 11:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Support There is a decent amount of EV in this image. Per nom, angle is good. Image is soft at full resolution; it seems it was focused on the other side of the fence. Good composition otherwise.--
WingtipvorteXPTT∅ 17:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support Quality is alright; the perspective is good for EV as it emphasizes the extent of the barrier. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠05:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose this has focus problems on the far left and also loses focus into the distance. I would support this same shot if we could get it without focus problems. Pine✉ 08:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Support. Good quality and unique display. It got me to look close into it.
ComputerJA (
talk) 20:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Neutral It's focused on the fence, not the road - that's a good thing! However this is only f/5.6 and didn't need the high shutter speed used, so greater depth was possible, and I cannot support. --
99of9 (
talk) 00:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
It was not shooted by a professional photographer.
Tomer T (
talk) 09:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
I am not either, so this is not professional advice ;-). But I do think that FP should be the best we've got - often that is achieved by amateurs, but sometimes it's not. --
99of9 (
talk) 10:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)reply
*Support - from my perspective having had a look I don't think the technical flaws have much of an impact on the image's encyclopedic value and don't outweigh it. Grandiose(
me,
talk,
contribs) 18:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)reply