Weak oppose - Technically, it's better than the last temple nomination you made. However, the perspective should be corrected, which is a problem since the crop is too tight for us to do that and keep the whole temple in frame. Also, some of the highlights are blown. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk)
05:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Blown highlights prevent me giving full support, but the detail is there sufficiently for me, if a tad soft... Certainly quite an interesting looking building...
gazhiley10:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose - Technically, it's better than the last temple nomination you made. However, the perspective should be corrected, which is a problem since the crop is too tight for us to do that and keep the whole temple in frame. Also, some of the highlights are blown. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk)
05:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak Support Blown highlights prevent me giving full support, but the detail is there sufficiently for me, if a tad soft... Certainly quite an interesting looking building...
gazhiley10:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply