Oppose Striking use of line, but technically lacking in sharpness, and the overexposed top left is a deal breaker.
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 10:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I believe that the overexposed top-left emphasises the natural lighting of the building instead of causing any loss of detail in the image.
Sanyambahga (
talk) 05:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose agree with Aaadddaaammm. Also this doesn't have high EV that might compensate for the technical problems.
Pine(talk) 02:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
The IIM-Bangalore is a highly prestigious management school in India. Photography is prohibited within the campus and I had to sought special permissions to be able to click photographs. It is difficult to find a good quality image of the institute.
Sanyambahga (
talk) 05:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose. I appreciate the difficulty of getting this shot, and it will be good to illustrate the article about the school. Unfortunately, the technical side of the picture is not up to the demanding standards of an FP. The focus seems a little bit soft throughout, some areas are overexposed and some are underexposed.
Clegs (
engage in rational discourse) 12:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I'm sorry but the technical quality is very bad. Too much overexposed, too much chromatic aberration in the overexposed regions(top left), also CAs in the top right bright areas. Also, I would have preferred geo-location. Composition could have been slightly better if the bright area on the right could have been excluded(by taking the shot from a bit further in. Also, this doesn't have much EV in
B. V. Doshi. A better description would be useful(e.g. which part of the institution is this).--
Gauravjuvekar (
talk) 16:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose Striking use of line, but technically lacking in sharpness, and the overexposed top left is a deal breaker.
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 10:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I believe that the overexposed top-left emphasises the natural lighting of the building instead of causing any loss of detail in the image.
Sanyambahga (
talk) 05:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose agree with Aaadddaaammm. Also this doesn't have high EV that might compensate for the technical problems.
Pine(talk) 02:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
The IIM-Bangalore is a highly prestigious management school in India. Photography is prohibited within the campus and I had to sought special permissions to be able to click photographs. It is difficult to find a good quality image of the institute.
Sanyambahga (
talk) 05:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose. I appreciate the difficulty of getting this shot, and it will be good to illustrate the article about the school. Unfortunately, the technical side of the picture is not up to the demanding standards of an FP. The focus seems a little bit soft throughout, some areas are overexposed and some are underexposed.
Clegs (
engage in rational discourse) 12:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose: I'm sorry but the technical quality is very bad. Too much overexposed, too much chromatic aberration in the overexposed regions(top left), also CAs in the top right bright areas. Also, I would have preferred geo-location. Composition could have been slightly better if the bright area on the right could have been excluded(by taking the shot from a bit further in. Also, this doesn't have much EV in
B. V. Doshi. A better description would be useful(e.g. which part of the institution is this).--
Gauravjuvekar (
talk) 16:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply