Indian Blackbird
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 08:56:51 (UTC)
- Reason
- good quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Common Blackbird, List of birds of Sweden, List of birds of Andhra Pradesh
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Andreas Trepte
- Support as nominator -- BNK( talk) 08:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral - It's a nice picture, but the cropping (not sure whether it was cropped) seems a little too tight for me. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 09:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Meets the criteria, and the standards for birds. Cowtowner ( talk) 16:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Crop doesn't bother me, especially at full size. I get the impression the worm is about to perform surprise sutemi-waza on that poor bird. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 00:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak support. Overfeatured category. TCO ( talk) 14:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's an unfair reason to half-support someone's image, which should stand of its own accord as it would on its own article. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 14:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, that's not a reason at all. What do you propose? We feature no more birds until we have an equivalent number of, say, molluscs?
Cowtowner (
talk) 16:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hey, what about us unicellular organisms? :-) Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 01:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. Uninspiring crop and a very common bird, so definitely replaceable. Good quality and a decent pose, though. The maggot adds EV. J Milburn ( talk) 15:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support I partially agree with Milburn, but there's only so much you can do and keep the image encyclopedic - too dramatic, and you need another image to show key features. So I'm fine with this. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T ( talk) 07:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Promoted File:Common Blackbird.jpg -- Armbrust The Homunculus 18:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Indian Blackbird
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 08:56:51 (UTC)
- Reason
- good quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Common Blackbird, List of birds of Sweden, List of birds of Andhra Pradesh
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Andreas Trepte
- Support as nominator -- BNK( talk) 08:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral - It's a nice picture, but the cropping (not sure whether it was cropped) seems a little too tight for me. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 09:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Meets the criteria, and the standards for birds. Cowtowner ( talk) 16:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Crop doesn't bother me, especially at full size. I get the impression the worm is about to perform surprise sutemi-waza on that poor bird. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 00:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak support. Overfeatured category. TCO ( talk) 14:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's an unfair reason to half-support someone's image, which should stand of its own accord as it would on its own article. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 14:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, that's not a reason at all. What do you propose? We feature no more birds until we have an equivalent number of, say, molluscs?
Cowtowner (
talk) 16:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hey, what about us unicellular organisms? :-) Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 01:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. Uninspiring crop and a very common bird, so definitely replaceable. Good quality and a decent pose, though. The maggot adds EV. J Milburn ( talk) 15:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support I partially agree with Milburn, but there's only so much you can do and keep the image encyclopedic - too dramatic, and you need another image to show key features. So I'm fine with this. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 06:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T ( talk) 07:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Promoted File:Common Blackbird.jpg -- Armbrust The Homunculus 18:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)