- Reason
- High quality image which combines enc value with some pretty nice aesthetics (IMO)
- Articles this image appears in
- Small White
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator -- Fir0002 04:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is lacking Capital photographer ( talk) 06:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1. A very attractive shot, and sharp enough where it counts.-- ragesoss ( talk) 19:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose both Sorry, but DOF is too narrow. — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support - Only because I like the edit, but I feel this will be one of your weakest candidates, Fir. -- Meldshal (§peak to me) 21:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful creature, but yeah, not sharp enough. Fletcher ( talk) 23:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Cool pic, but it has some DOF issues. Clegs ( talk) 16:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 02:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image which combines enc value with some pretty nice aesthetics (IMO)
- Articles this image appears in
- Small White
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator -- Fir0002 04:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is lacking Capital photographer ( talk) 06:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1. A very attractive shot, and sharp enough where it counts.-- ragesoss ( talk) 19:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose both Sorry, but DOF is too narrow. — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support - Only because I like the edit, but I feel this will be one of your weakest candidates, Fir. -- Meldshal (§peak to me) 21:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful creature, but yeah, not sharp enough. Fletcher ( talk) 23:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Cool pic, but it has some DOF issues. Clegs ( talk) 16:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 02:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)