Pelargonium graveolens
- Reason
- High resolution photograph of Pelargonium graveolens(Rose Geranium).
- Articles this image appears in
- Pelargonium graveolens
- Creator
- Laitche
- Support as nominator -- Laitche ( talk) 15:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Sharp focus, nice composure, no noise. Also depicts its subject well. Sam Barsoom 20:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp. Shooting it from the side may have been more enc than head-on, because the lengths of the structures are more clearly visible.-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 22:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent macro, and pleasing composition. Can't fault it. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful macro, crisp subject, vivid colours, pleasing composition and smooth diffused background. Capital photographer ( talk) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Ooooo, look at that bokeh! Creamy. Great shot. - Fcb981( talk: contribs) 04:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject takes up too small a portion of the picture. It would be far better if the picture was centered.
EgraS (
talk) 06:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- I gather you mainly take snapshots then Capital photographer ( talk) 03:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Why would you make assumptions about one persons photography (or if they even partake in photography) based on their preference for a center composition for encyclopedia illustrations? I also prefer that encyclopedia illustrations have non-artistic compositions with limited negative space, does that make me a bad photographer? Cacophony ( talk) 17:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support per Capital photographer. crassic
Pelargonium graveolens
- Reason
- High resolution photograph of Pelargonium graveolens(Rose Geranium).
- Articles this image appears in
- Pelargonium graveolens
- Creator
- Laitche
- Support as nominator -- Laitche ( talk) 15:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Sharp focus, nice composure, no noise. Also depicts its subject well. Sam Barsoom 20:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp. Shooting it from the side may have been more enc than head-on, because the lengths of the structures are more clearly visible.-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 22:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent macro, and pleasing composition. Can't fault it. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful macro, crisp subject, vivid colours, pleasing composition and smooth diffused background. Capital photographer ( talk) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Ooooo, look at that bokeh! Creamy. Great shot. - Fcb981( talk: contribs) 04:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject takes up too small a portion of the picture. It would be far better if the picture was centered.
EgraS (
talk) 06:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- I gather you mainly take snapshots then Capital photographer ( talk) 03:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Why would you make assumptions about one persons photography (or if they even partake in photography) based on their preference for a center composition for encyclopedia illustrations? I also prefer that encyclopedia illustrations have non-artistic compositions with limited negative space, does that make me a bad photographer? Cacophony ( talk) 17:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support per Capital photographer. crassic![ talk 02:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Beautiful, encyclopedic, and high quality. Nautica Shad es 01:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very nice picture. I like the vivid colour. Spencer T♦ C 18:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Rose Geranium.jpg MER-C 12:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)