- Reason
- A good quality and high resolution depiction of a umbel taken from a less usual angle, showing the flower stalks and giving a better perspective of the inflorescence's structure
- Articles this image appears in
- Daucus carota, Umbel
- Creator
- Joaquim Alves Gaspar
- Support as nominator -- Alvesgaspar ( talk) 19:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Regretful, weak oppose This is an example of an unusual composition that still achieves top enc value, and I don't oppose it for that. However, nothing seems to be in focus. I think the problem is that you're trying to capture different parts of the flower which are (relatively) far away from one another.--
HereToHelp (
talk to me)
20:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: The focus appears to be on the top of the stem. I like the image, but everything around the center point blurs a tad. -- IdLoveOne ( talk) 17:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Inadequate DOF - this would probably work really well as a 5 or 6 frame focus stack. Everything is nicely in layers front to back. Mfield ( talk) 20:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I like the image, but the depth of field is unfortunately too shallow. Nautica Shad es 21:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Much of the plant is out of focus. And the white part is terribly overblown. crassic
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good quality and high resolution depiction of a umbel taken from a less usual angle, showing the flower stalks and giving a better perspective of the inflorescence's structure
- Articles this image appears in
- Daucus carota, Umbel
- Creator
- Joaquim Alves Gaspar
- Support as nominator -- Alvesgaspar ( talk) 19:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Regretful, weak oppose This is an example of an unusual composition that still achieves top enc value, and I don't oppose it for that. However, nothing seems to be in focus. I think the problem is that you're trying to capture different parts of the flower which are (relatively) far away from one another.--
HereToHelp (
talk to me)
20:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: The focus appears to be on the top of the stem. I like the image, but everything around the center point blurs a tad. -- IdLoveOne ( talk) 17:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Inadequate DOF - this would probably work really well as a 5 or 6 frame focus stack. Everything is nicely in layers front to back. Mfield ( talk) 20:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I like the image, but the depth of field is unfortunately too shallow. Nautica Shad es 21:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Much of the plant is out of focus. And the white part is terribly overblown. crassic![ talk 02:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)