Oppose A good capture, but I also think the lighting is dull. Elaboration: compare it against
Image:Long-billed Corella.jpg, another Noodle Snacks bird profile. The colors in that image are much more vivid, the setting on the log elegant in contrast to the drab ground in the subject image. And correspondingly the Corella, while not yet promoted, has attracted universal support as I write this, again in contrast to the subject image.
Fletcher (
talk)
02:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll probably go to Maria Island and try again later in the year, but its fair to point out that it is a grey bird and the colors aren't particularly vivid to begin with. More contrast in the lighting and a better background are probably in order (but bear in mind that they don't tend to feed around interesting backgrounds).
Noodle snacks (
talk)
02:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Support a large, decent quality image that adds value to the article. Would probably have garnered more support if the subject was brightly coloured.
Guest9999 (
talk)
13:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment I am sure the flatness complained about could be mitigated to a fair degree by an edit from the actual original per my Edit 1. I am reluctant to spend any more time improving Edit 1 itself as there are jpeg artifacts from the original save that will be brought out too much. A complete re-edit from the actual original would be needed.
Mfield (
talk)
17:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose A good capture, but I also think the lighting is dull. Elaboration: compare it against
Image:Long-billed Corella.jpg, another Noodle Snacks bird profile. The colors in that image are much more vivid, the setting on the log elegant in contrast to the drab ground in the subject image. And correspondingly the Corella, while not yet promoted, has attracted universal support as I write this, again in contrast to the subject image.
Fletcher (
talk)
02:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll probably go to Maria Island and try again later in the year, but its fair to point out that it is a grey bird and the colors aren't particularly vivid to begin with. More contrast in the lighting and a better background are probably in order (but bear in mind that they don't tend to feed around interesting backgrounds).
Noodle snacks (
talk)
02:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Support a large, decent quality image that adds value to the article. Would probably have garnered more support if the subject was brightly coloured.
Guest9999 (
talk)
13:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment I am sure the flatness complained about could be mitigated to a fair degree by an edit from the actual original per my Edit 1. I am reluctant to spend any more time improving Edit 1 itself as there are jpeg artifacts from the original save that will be brought out too much. A complete re-edit from the actual original would be needed.
Mfield (
talk)
17:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)reply