- Reason
- Nice quality and focus
- Articles in which this image appears
- Idea leuconoe
- Creator
- Pro2
- Support as nominator -- Rehratep ( talk) 07:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose. At this time, the image is used only in a gallery, and so it's encyclopedic value is not clear. I admit the image quality is excellent, but we are not going to be able to promote the image now. Perhaps if the article was a good bit longer, this could be one of two infobox pictures. I am not certain that it would work as the only image used inline, though it certainly seems to be the best image in the article, in technical terms.J Milburn ( talk) 12:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)- After consideration, I've gone ahead and switched the photos- both have a place in the article, but, as a high quality, compelling shot, this one has earnt its place in the infobox. It seems a shame to refuse a quality image FP status on what is, in many ways, a technicality. As such, due to the high technical quality, compelling composition and high EV, I am happy to support this image. J Milburn ( talk) 11:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Mbz1 ( talk) 04:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either: Very good shot and sits well in the infobox. I'm sure the article can be expanded, will try to add some content if I find the time. Maedin\ talk 07:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Edit 1 Uploaded
- Support Edit 1 small but ok -- Muhammad (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer edit 1. -- Avenue ( talk) 01:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer original. Leaf edges are visually distracting on the crop. Durova 412 15:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Comment on preference for original or edit 1, please. Makeemlighter ( talk) 02:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Support either, prefer edit 1. I think I see what Durova is talking about, but I don't find the leaf edges distracting, and the edit provides better focus on the butterfly. Jujutacular T · C 08:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe crop.jpg -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 04:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Reason
- Nice quality and focus
- Articles in which this image appears
- Idea leuconoe
- Creator
- Pro2
- Support as nominator -- Rehratep ( talk) 07:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose. At this time, the image is used only in a gallery, and so it's encyclopedic value is not clear. I admit the image quality is excellent, but we are not going to be able to promote the image now. Perhaps if the article was a good bit longer, this could be one of two infobox pictures. I am not certain that it would work as the only image used inline, though it certainly seems to be the best image in the article, in technical terms.J Milburn ( talk) 12:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)- After consideration, I've gone ahead and switched the photos- both have a place in the article, but, as a high quality, compelling shot, this one has earnt its place in the infobox. It seems a shame to refuse a quality image FP status on what is, in many ways, a technicality. As such, due to the high technical quality, compelling composition and high EV, I am happy to support this image. J Milburn ( talk) 11:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- Mbz1 ( talk) 04:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either: Very good shot and sits well in the infobox. I'm sure the article can be expanded, will try to add some content if I find the time. Maedin\ talk 07:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Edit 1 Uploaded
- Support Edit 1 small but ok -- Muhammad (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer edit 1. -- Avenue ( talk) 01:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer original. Leaf edges are visually distracting on the crop. Durova 412 15:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment on preference for original or edit 1, please. Makeemlighter ( talk) 02:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support either, prefer edit 1. I think I see what Durova is talking about, but I don't find the leaf edges distracting, and the edit provides better focus on the butterfly. Jujutacular T · C 08:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe crop.jpg -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 04:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)