Comment: It strikes me as odd that this is not in the article on the storm itself.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Response: Upon checking, it actually IS in the article, the lede image actually. When I initiated this nomination, I used the "File usage" section on the main image page to see what articles the image was used in. This is actually just a cropped and far less blurry image of the one in the lede.
TropicalAnalystwx13 (
talk) 22:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Which means it's NOT in the article. If you want to claim it is in articles, then it has to be this image, not a considerably different version of it. To claim it you'd need to replace its uncropped blurry cousin with this one. --
jjron (
talk) 15:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment: It strikes me as odd that this is not in the article on the storm itself.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Response: Upon checking, it actually IS in the article, the lede image actually. When I initiated this nomination, I used the "File usage" section on the main image page to see what articles the image was used in. This is actually just a cropped and far less blurry image of the one in the lede.
TropicalAnalystwx13 (
talk) 22:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Which means it's NOT in the article. If you want to claim it is in articles, then it has to be this image, not a considerably different version of it. To claim it you'd need to replace its uncropped blurry cousin with this one. --
jjron (
talk) 15:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)reply