- Reason
- As a historic landmark of Tacoma, Washington, the image has good encyclopedic value, the resolution is high and the technical execution is very good.
- Articles this image appears in
- Stadium High School
- Creator
- Farwestern
- Support as nominator -- Farwestern ( talk) 22:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the projections is wrong for an encyclopedic shot -- Muhammad (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- General comment: Where's the 360 panorama viewer tool...I forget where it is. Spencer T♦ Nominate! 03:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yeah, unfortunately it just seems too warped to appreciate fully as the subject is very close to the nodal point. Also, there's some funky luminosity shifts on the building and the sky is completely blown. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per Diliff – the warping is, unfortunately, disorienting. I couldn't figure out what the shape of the building was and where the picture was taken from until I checked it in google maps. -- JN 466 17:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose, but you have a good start. If you can't get a little farther back because of some obstruction the warping would probably be okay by necessity but the blown out sky should be fixed. Nice shot though, great picture for a HS article. gren グレン 23:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose' gives a false impression of the real buildings. The full width image on the page looks like the building is coming to eat you. Sandpiper ( talk) 07:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Shoemaker's Holiday Over 206 FCs served 02:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- As a historic landmark of Tacoma, Washington, the image has good encyclopedic value, the resolution is high and the technical execution is very good.
- Articles this image appears in
- Stadium High School
- Creator
- Farwestern
- Support as nominator -- Farwestern ( talk) 22:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the projections is wrong for an encyclopedic shot -- Muhammad (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- General comment: Where's the 360 panorama viewer tool...I forget where it is. Spencer T♦ Nominate! 03:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yeah, unfortunately it just seems too warped to appreciate fully as the subject is very close to the nodal point. Also, there's some funky luminosity shifts on the building and the sky is completely blown. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per Diliff – the warping is, unfortunately, disorienting. I couldn't figure out what the shape of the building was and where the picture was taken from until I checked it in google maps. -- JN 466 17:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose, but you have a good start. If you can't get a little farther back because of some obstruction the warping would probably be okay by necessity but the blown out sky should be fixed. Nice shot though, great picture for a HS article. gren グレン 23:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose' gives a false impression of the real buildings. The full width image on the page looks like the building is coming to eat you. Sandpiper ( talk) 07:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Shoemaker's Holiday Over 206 FCs served 02:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)