- Reason
- why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)
- Articles this image appears in
- links to the article/s that use this image
- Creator
- evilarry
- Support as nominator -- Evilarry ( talk) 13:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose (motion?) blur. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Does not appear in any articles. No caption provided. Muhammad (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The entire image is verry blurry. The lights in the background give of a bright glare, and that bush on the bottom is distracting. Not in any articles, either. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry (probably didn't use a tripod in the low light?) and not in any articles. Clegs ( talk) 15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Even without all the faults listed so far and more, it would still be a wretched nightshot cliche Motmit ( talk) 16:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy close Appears in no articles, no caption here. Low enc. Very blurry. Mfield ( talk) 00:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment, you should give WP:FP? a close read through and then look at WP:FP. It's a good try but it's not featured picture material. Thanks. gren グレン 06:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose not FP material - massive camera shake (long exposure (30s) without a tripod, for some strange reason it was taken on ISO 100), out of focus, noisy, blown lights. Only satisfies criteria 2, 4, 5 and 6. Additionally, the nominator did not give a reason, caption or list of articles the image appears in, and the image page has no FPC tag - so it appears the nominator didn't read the nomination instructions or follow them all the way through. Not a brilliant indication of good intentions or effort in nominating an image. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 07:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)
- Articles this image appears in
- links to the article/s that use this image
- Creator
- evilarry
- Support as nominator -- Evilarry ( talk) 13:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose (motion?) blur. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Does not appear in any articles. No caption provided. Muhammad (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The entire image is verry blurry. The lights in the background give of a bright glare, and that bush on the bottom is distracting. Not in any articles, either. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry (probably didn't use a tripod in the low light?) and not in any articles. Clegs ( talk) 15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Even without all the faults listed so far and more, it would still be a wretched nightshot cliche Motmit ( talk) 16:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy close Appears in no articles, no caption here. Low enc. Very blurry. Mfield ( talk) 00:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment, you should give WP:FP? a close read through and then look at WP:FP. It's a good try but it's not featured picture material. Thanks. gren グレン 06:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose not FP material - massive camera shake (long exposure (30s) without a tripod, for some strange reason it was taken on ISO 100), out of focus, noisy, blown lights. Only satisfies criteria 2, 4, 5 and 6. Additionally, the nominator did not give a reason, caption or list of articles the image appears in, and the image page has no FPC tag - so it appears the nominator didn't read the nomination instructions or follow them all the way through. Not a brilliant indication of good intentions or effort in nominating an image. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 07:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)