OriginalEdit 1 by
Fir0002Edit 2 by
Fir0002, lighter version of aboveAlternative 1Alternative 2
Reason
Clear, well composed portrait style shot of a hereford calf prior to any marking, tagging, etc. Nice detail in key features of the animal. Compares well to currently featured animal 'portrait' shots.
Weak Support Edit 1, very sharp and detailed image. It's not as good for an encyclopaedia as it could be, though, because of the lack of DOF. The original is underexposed and dull, while edit 2 is overexposed. --
Aqwis15:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Question Edit 1 does wonders for saturation and warmth but I can't help feeling all versions are little tight-cropped at the bottom. Is this full-frame or could it be opened up a bit? --
mikaultalk18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Yeah, it's basically full frame. I have added two more alternatives that have more 'room'; I thought the original was probably the best, but others may prefer one of the alts. --
jjron23:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply
OriginalEdit 1 by
Fir0002Edit 2 by
Fir0002, lighter version of aboveAlternative 1Alternative 2
Reason
Clear, well composed portrait style shot of a hereford calf prior to any marking, tagging, etc. Nice detail in key features of the animal. Compares well to currently featured animal 'portrait' shots.
Weak Support Edit 1, very sharp and detailed image. It's not as good for an encyclopaedia as it could be, though, because of the lack of DOF. The original is underexposed and dull, while edit 2 is overexposed. --
Aqwis15:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Question Edit 1 does wonders for saturation and warmth but I can't help feeling all versions are little tight-cropped at the bottom. Is this full-frame or could it be opened up a bit? --
mikaultalk18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Yeah, it's basically full frame. I have added two more alternatives that have more 'room'; I thought the original was probably the best, but others may prefer one of the alts. --
jjron23:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)reply