This has been done but unfortunately [[User:Solipsist|] remains adamant that he does not wish to upload a larger image. Whilst this is obviously entirely up to him, it does unfortunately mean that an image that (perhaps unlike some which he highlighted) would definitely benefit from being available in a size where you can see greater detail looks like it might well be delisted. A shame. --
CountdownCrispy(?18:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep I don't believe size is a good reason, 'per se', to delist older pictures. I also think this is a delightful and charming picture, and it will continue to be indepenedentely of technological evolution. -
Alvesgaspar22:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral. It's a shame Solipsist won't provide a bigger version just to make a point. In my opinion, this is definitely not the time and place to do it, but it is his right. However, isn't the only criteria, and I we can't delist it just for that. NauticaShades20:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't think he's just doing it to make a point, he seems to have gotten this picture from someone else to upload, so I don't think he has a higher res version
Night Gyr (
talk/
Oy)
16:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist If a higher resolution is available. The picture doesn't have the WOW factor anyway and if the creator is not going to upload a higher resolution, he won't have the chance to renominate it for FP again. Size is not enough to delist, but If we are sure that a higher resolution is available, then this should go. would Support If the author would just make a little effort and upload the bigger one. I agree with
User:Nauticashades. By the way, the author has so many other amazing photos that can't become FP because of their size. Such a pity. --
Arad00:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This has been done but unfortunately [[User:Solipsist|] remains adamant that he does not wish to upload a larger image. Whilst this is obviously entirely up to him, it does unfortunately mean that an image that (perhaps unlike some which he highlighted) would definitely benefit from being available in a size where you can see greater detail looks like it might well be delisted. A shame. --
CountdownCrispy(?18:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep I don't believe size is a good reason, 'per se', to delist older pictures. I also think this is a delightful and charming picture, and it will continue to be indepenedentely of technological evolution. -
Alvesgaspar22:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral. It's a shame Solipsist won't provide a bigger version just to make a point. In my opinion, this is definitely not the time and place to do it, but it is his right. However, isn't the only criteria, and I we can't delist it just for that. NauticaShades20:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't think he's just doing it to make a point, he seems to have gotten this picture from someone else to upload, so I don't think he has a higher res version
Night Gyr (
talk/
Oy)
16:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist If a higher resolution is available. The picture doesn't have the WOW factor anyway and if the creator is not going to upload a higher resolution, he won't have the chance to renominate it for FP again. Size is not enough to delist, but If we are sure that a higher resolution is available, then this should go. would Support If the author would just make a little effort and upload the bigger one. I agree with
User:Nauticashades. By the way, the author has so many other amazing photos that can't become FP because of their size. Such a pity. --
Arad00:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply