Oppose escalators are blurred, and the caption gives little explanation of what exactly the photo shows that's significant.
Pinetalk05:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Quality aside, this photo is supposed to illustrate the station, but it mostly shows the entry of an escalator (I first thought it is meant for an escalator article :). I would make a few steps ahead, to get rid (or reduce the coverage, try several shots) of the escalator, and see what comes out.
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose Nice picture, good view (of part) of the station. None of it seems to be in full focus. It doesn't have that clean, sharp look that it should have.
Dusty777 (
talk)
17:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose escalators are blurred, and the caption gives little explanation of what exactly the photo shows that's significant.
Pinetalk05:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Quality aside, this photo is supposed to illustrate the station, but it mostly shows the entry of an escalator (I first thought it is meant for an escalator article :). I would make a few steps ahead, to get rid (or reduce the coverage, try several shots) of the escalator, and see what comes out.
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose Nice picture, good view (of part) of the station. None of it seems to be in full focus. It doesn't have that clean, sharp look that it should have.
Dusty777 (
talk)
17:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply