Both are of good quality, DOF, and EV. Original is a focus stacking under natural conditions and natural lighting. Alternative is fill flash picture taken during a light rainfall, with a towel covering the camera and lens :) The only images of the caterpillar avaiable on wikipedia.
CommentSupport More information for identification would make it a more useful picture. Species id would of course be nice, but merely listing location and habitat, plus if you saw it chew on a particular plant, would go a long way.
Narayanese (
talk)
18:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Species id is not possible and this was the best the experts could provide. It was resting on a
Sugar apple leaf on which it also fed. Pictured in Dar es Salaam. This information has also been added to the image pages. --
Muhammad(talk)07:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Support both Although I suppose the original should take priority. I think the pic has sufficient EV for the articles it is in without better classification.
Terri G (
talk)
16:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Both are of good quality, DOF, and EV. Original is a focus stacking under natural conditions and natural lighting. Alternative is fill flash picture taken during a light rainfall, with a towel covering the camera and lens :) The only images of the caterpillar avaiable on wikipedia.
CommentSupport More information for identification would make it a more useful picture. Species id would of course be nice, but merely listing location and habitat, plus if you saw it chew on a particular plant, would go a long way.
Narayanese (
talk)
18:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Species id is not possible and this was the best the experts could provide. It was resting on a
Sugar apple leaf on which it also fed. Pictured in Dar es Salaam. This information has also been added to the image pages. --
Muhammad(talk)07:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Support both Although I suppose the original should take priority. I think the pic has sufficient EV for the articles it is in without better classification.
Terri G (
talk)
16:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply