Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2011 at 08:38:52 (UTC)
Original - A schematic depiction of the construction of a
pianoforte (part names are listed in the illustration's file)Action of a grand piano - part of a set as per Chick's comment?
Reason
High quality SVG showing good schematic of piano design. Used on about 30 wikis, and featured on Commons. (Note: I know stuff all about pianos, so if this has some glaring problems please point them out, but going on how widely it's used I assume it's pretty accurate.)
Support as nominator --
jjron (
talk) 08:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply
There's a
separate diagram for the action. Should they be considered as a set? Otherwise, it's a little weird not to have the parts of the action labeled.
Chick Bowen 22:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Shrug. You've exceeded my knowledge of pianos. I've added the other diagram to the nom if that helps. --
jjron (
talk) 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
It's a bit odd that the two diagrams are facing in opposite directions. May one should be flipped to make them easier to follow.--
RDBury (
talk) 22:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
You know, I know this was my idea, but now that I look more closely at them, they're actually not the same. There's no capo bar on the action one. Of the various action diagrams floating around, none of them matches up perfectly with the diagram of the whole. The more I look at these, the more I think they're basically composites and not based on any particular instrument.
Chick Bowen 19:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Support as set. Good, high-quality illustrations. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 19:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Is there any good reason that the action is the mirror image of the piano? I find it a little disorienting.
Cowtowner (
talk) 22:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Further comments: The action diagram isn't actually in the Piano article now it's only at the bottom of
Action (piano). Also, these
twodiagrams of other sorts of actions are currently in the article and probably of equal quality.
Cowtowner (
talk) 22:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2011 at 08:38:52 (UTC)
Original - A schematic depiction of the construction of a
pianoforte (part names are listed in the illustration's file)Action of a grand piano - part of a set as per Chick's comment?
Reason
High quality SVG showing good schematic of piano design. Used on about 30 wikis, and featured on Commons. (Note: I know stuff all about pianos, so if this has some glaring problems please point them out, but going on how widely it's used I assume it's pretty accurate.)
Support as nominator --
jjron (
talk) 08:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply
There's a
separate diagram for the action. Should they be considered as a set? Otherwise, it's a little weird not to have the parts of the action labeled.
Chick Bowen 22:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Shrug. You've exceeded my knowledge of pianos. I've added the other diagram to the nom if that helps. --
jjron (
talk) 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
It's a bit odd that the two diagrams are facing in opposite directions. May one should be flipped to make them easier to follow.--
RDBury (
talk) 22:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
You know, I know this was my idea, but now that I look more closely at them, they're actually not the same. There's no capo bar on the action one. Of the various action diagrams floating around, none of them matches up perfectly with the diagram of the whole. The more I look at these, the more I think they're basically composites and not based on any particular instrument.
Chick Bowen 19:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Support as set. Good, high-quality illustrations. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 19:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Is there any good reason that the action is the mirror image of the piano? I find it a little disorienting.
Cowtowner (
talk) 22:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Further comments: The action diagram isn't actually in the Piano article now it's only at the bottom of
Action (piano). Also, these
twodiagrams of other sorts of actions are currently in the article and probably of equal quality.
Cowtowner (
talk) 22:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)reply