Oppose. It's an interesting and valuable document, but as an image it doesn't grab me much at all. In contrast to, e.g., the WWII instruments of surrender, this is almost completely a product of the mediating technology (pasted together at the receiving end in a standard way) rather than an intentional visual composition.--
ragesoss (
talk) 14:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Per ragesoss. Also, adding on, only medium quality, not one of your best until improved, Durova. --Meldshal 00:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Per Ragesoss
Clegs (
talk) 00:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted . --
John254 02:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose. It's an interesting and valuable document, but as an image it doesn't grab me much at all. In contrast to, e.g., the WWII instruments of surrender, this is almost completely a product of the mediating technology (pasted together at the receiving end in a standard way) rather than an intentional visual composition.--
ragesoss (
talk) 14:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Per ragesoss. Also, adding on, only medium quality, not one of your best until improved, Durova. --Meldshal 00:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Oppose Per Ragesoss
Clegs (
talk) 00:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Not promoted . --
John254 02:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)reply