Original - Masked Lapwing (Vanellus miles), nesting pairs defend their territory against all intruders by calling loudly, spreading their wings, and then swooping fast and low, and where necessary striking at interlopers with their feet and attacking animals on the ground with a conspicuous yellow spur on the carpal joint of the wing.Alt
Reason
flying shots so mitigates the slightly lower IQ than usual (IMO), shows the wing spurs and facial mask well which are both destinguishing features of these birds.
Support as nominator, and this is the crap being swooped out of me ... I left quickly after taking these ;-) --
Benjamint 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - They are both good, i'd go with the first. I think the image quality is negligibly different from what we would expect. Good shot! --Childzy ¤ Talk 16:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose Its pretty soft. I'm not sure if it's motion blur or just plain out of focus. Your bravery is to be commended however.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 09:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support An interesting bird in flight, I could overlook some quality problems for that one.--
Mbz1 (
talk) 02:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support first photo. Not sharp, but high EV for threat response. Some leeway for a fast flight shot is reasonable IMO. The second photo doesn't have the same wow for me. --
Avenue (
talk) 09:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Original - Masked Lapwing (Vanellus miles), nesting pairs defend their territory against all intruders by calling loudly, spreading their wings, and then swooping fast and low, and where necessary striking at interlopers with their feet and attacking animals on the ground with a conspicuous yellow spur on the carpal joint of the wing.Alt
Reason
flying shots so mitigates the slightly lower IQ than usual (IMO), shows the wing spurs and facial mask well which are both destinguishing features of these birds.
Support as nominator, and this is the crap being swooped out of me ... I left quickly after taking these ;-) --
Benjamint 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support - They are both good, i'd go with the first. I think the image quality is negligibly different from what we would expect. Good shot! --Childzy ¤ Talk 16:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose Its pretty soft. I'm not sure if it's motion blur or just plain out of focus. Your bravery is to be commended however.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 09:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support An interesting bird in flight, I could overlook some quality problems for that one.--
Mbz1 (
talk) 02:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support first photo. Not sharp, but high EV for threat response. Some leeway for a fast flight shot is reasonable IMO. The second photo doesn't have the same wow for me. --
Avenue (
talk) 09:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply