Original - Zinnia flowers have a range of appearances, from a single row of petals, to a dome shape, with the colors white, chartreuse, yellow, orange, red, purple, and lilac.The leaves are opposite and usually stalkless (sessile), with a shape ranging from linear to ovate, and pale to middle green in color.Alt 1 Square crop of a different flower of the same species.
Reason
Good quality and EV. Well focus flower and non distracting leaves add EV. Good lighting as well.
Oppose. Snapshotty lighting, and for a flower shot (static subject, intrinsically pretty) the picture should have more artistic merit than this (goes for the alt too). --
Dschwen19:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Question I would welcome an explanation of what are the flaws of the lighting in this picture. What is wrong and in what way it could be better? For me this is one of those moments in which I really don't see what is going on and I feel I would learn a lot new things if someone explains me a little. Thanks. Franklin.vp 15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Original - Zinnia flowers have a range of appearances, from a single row of petals, to a dome shape, with the colors white, chartreuse, yellow, orange, red, purple, and lilac.The leaves are opposite and usually stalkless (sessile), with a shape ranging from linear to ovate, and pale to middle green in color.Alt 1 Square crop of a different flower of the same species.
Reason
Good quality and EV. Well focus flower and non distracting leaves add EV. Good lighting as well.
Oppose. Snapshotty lighting, and for a flower shot (static subject, intrinsically pretty) the picture should have more artistic merit than this (goes for the alt too). --
Dschwen19:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Question I would welcome an explanation of what are the flaws of the lighting in this picture. What is wrong and in what way it could be better? For me this is one of those moments in which I really don't see what is going on and I feel I would learn a lot new things if someone explains me a little. Thanks. Franklin.vp 15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply