Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2011 at 23:05:03 (UTC)
Reason
It has good contrast, accurate exposure and neutral colour balance (well at least that is what the image histogram strongly suggests). It meets the pixel criteria. Its probably the most photogenic of what's left of
Sir George Staunton's work in
Staunton Country Park (The Shell House is heavily shaded and damaged, the Chinese bridge has been reduced to it's bare structure and the lake has been altered). It adds value to the article in that it shows the structure and gives some idea of what the park would have been like before
William Henry Stone got his hands on it and the trees became somewhat overgrown. The only editing done is a slight rotation and crop.
It doesn't really feel like it has strong EV at the moment. This is more of a reflection on the article (which really focuses on the park itself) than the image. What about creating an article for the Beacon itself?
JJ Harrison (
talk)
10:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2011 at 23:05:03 (UTC)
Reason
It has good contrast, accurate exposure and neutral colour balance (well at least that is what the image histogram strongly suggests). It meets the pixel criteria. Its probably the most photogenic of what's left of
Sir George Staunton's work in
Staunton Country Park (The Shell House is heavily shaded and damaged, the Chinese bridge has been reduced to it's bare structure and the lake has been altered). It adds value to the article in that it shows the structure and gives some idea of what the park would have been like before
William Henry Stone got his hands on it and the trees became somewhat overgrown. The only editing done is a slight rotation and crop.
It doesn't really feel like it has strong EV at the moment. This is more of a reflection on the article (which really focuses on the park itself) than the image. What about creating an article for the Beacon itself?
JJ Harrison (
talk)
10:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)reply