- Reason
- A very useful addition to a number of articles. In some cases it has replaced another image. This one is better because it shows all eight eyes and is considerably more detailed. I am quite surprised that the subject sat still long enough for a stack or two. I would have liked the softbox a bit lower to get some catch lights in the front eyes. Was not physically possible however (front of lens was about an inch from the spider).
- Articles this image appears in
- Spider, Jumping spider, Simple eyes in arthropods
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator -- Noodle snacks ( talk) 01:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very good EV and wow -- Muhammad (talk) 01:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support per Muhammad. upstate NYer 03:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Best EV in the 'Simple eyes in arthropods' article, where DOF isn't as important to illustrate the subject. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Though of course we should all oppose because its legs are cut off.
Stevage
14:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed I'm rethinking my vote... upstate NYer 23:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support, weakness per Stevage. I'm really not a giant fan of these hyper-closeup bug shots that lose big parts of the critter to blur/frame.
Staxringold
talk
contribs
04:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- In 3/3 article cases this is illustrating eyes specifically. File:Salticidae sp. AF.jpg is the whole thing and may be nominated at a later date (different articles). Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Plus "per Stevage" makes me kind of laugh, considering he was being sarcastic. upstate NYer 03:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support as a good illustration of the creature's eyes. Also, thanks for the nightmares. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 13:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Stacking artifacts and over-sharpened, but otherwise a good illustration of spider eyes. Kaldari ( talk) 20:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose although the eye part is fantastic, the blurry legs are visually distracting IMO. — DroEsperanto ( talk) 04:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Salticidae sp. AF 2.jpg-- Shoemaker's Holiday Over 206 FCs served 04:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very useful addition to a number of articles. In some cases it has replaced another image. This one is better because it shows all eight eyes and is considerably more detailed. I am quite surprised that the subject sat still long enough for a stack or two. I would have liked the softbox a bit lower to get some catch lights in the front eyes. Was not physically possible however (front of lens was about an inch from the spider).
- Articles this image appears in
- Spider, Jumping spider, Simple eyes in arthropods
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator -- Noodle snacks ( talk) 01:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very good EV and wow -- Muhammad (talk) 01:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support per Muhammad. upstate NYer 03:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Best EV in the 'Simple eyes in arthropods' article, where DOF isn't as important to illustrate the subject. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Though of course we should all oppose because its legs are cut off.
Stevage
14:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed I'm rethinking my vote... upstate NYer 23:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support, weakness per Stevage. I'm really not a giant fan of these hyper-closeup bug shots that lose big parts of the critter to blur/frame.
Staxringold
talk
contribs
04:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- In 3/3 article cases this is illustrating eyes specifically. File:Salticidae sp. AF.jpg is the whole thing and may be nominated at a later date (different articles). Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Plus "per Stevage" makes me kind of laugh, considering he was being sarcastic. upstate NYer 03:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support as a good illustration of the creature's eyes. Also, thanks for the nightmares. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 13:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Stacking artifacts and over-sharpened, but otherwise a good illustration of spider eyes. Kaldari ( talk) 20:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose although the eye part is fantastic, the blurry legs are visually distracting IMO. — DroEsperanto ( talk) 04:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Salticidae sp. AF 2.jpg-- Shoemaker's Holiday Over 206 FCs served 04:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)