Reason

High quality technically and excellent EV. I've included the bottom view of this apple because it's so distinctive.

Articles this image appears in

Red Delicious

Creator

Fir0002

• Support as nominator -- Fir0002 10:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support Well done, as usual. The extra view certainly helps the enc value, although it should not be used against other studio shots without it. However, all of these studio shots (we have other ones) are getting unmanageable. However, they do not make for a good {{ FeaturedPictureSet}} because there is no logical lead image, no way to complete or even properly define the set ("here's all the fruit we have; more may come later!"), and each image is worthy of featured status by itself. (Are they?) The best solution, then, would be to create a subpage of natural shots vs. studio shots, but even that is hard to qualify sometimes. I'm also worried about inundating the Main Page with all of these similar images.-- HereToHelp ^{( talk to me)} 18:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Inundating the Main Page should not be a worry, since we produce plenty of FPs to keep up an not every one has to appear on the Main Page. We can simply skip these ones (or postpone them to spread them out) when their turn comes.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support, even though it should be a crime to make Red Delicious apples look good, since it's such an inferior variety.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support per above. Durova ^Charge! 01:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support Inferior? This looks quite tasty to me! Makeemlighter ( talk) 02:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support -- Avala ( talk) 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Comment This apple seems to have more debris on it than the pink lady in the other nom. Also, the lighting seems harsh and intense to me. Spikebrennan ( talk) 20:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Promoted File:Red delicious and cross section.jpg MER-C 07:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply