Support. Definitely something I can get behind- genuinely interesting and academic material, and from an underrepresented corner of the world. Great picture.
J Milburn (
talk) 12:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak Support. Detail/image quality could be better considering this is a very bog-standard composition and very easy to reproduce, but as mentioned, it's underrepresented and sneaks over the line IMO.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 17:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment. The EV of the photo would be improved if there were a way to include a size reference (such as a person or a horse near the wall, so that the viewer can get a sense of the size of the subject).
Spikebrennan (
talk) 18:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support -- Stunning in a bleak sort of way. Beautiful shot.
JBarta (
talk) 08:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Nice photograph.
Aequo (
talk) 07:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support The quality is pretty solid and it is a great representation. ~
Arjun 14:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Per composition and great encyclopedic quality (remotel historical jewel).
Materialscientist (
talk) 08:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose It's hard to estimate the building's size and the sky is noisy and there's some CA on the edges of the fortress.--
Someone35 17:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - high encyclopaedic value. There are some minor technical issues, but it's a FP on Commons. --
Xijky (
talk) 17:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support There's a door for size reference (and FYI the building is 35m x 35m x the WP page doesn't mention the height).
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 08:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Qasr Kharana in Jordan.jpg --
Makeemlighter (
talk) 23:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Definitely something I can get behind- genuinely interesting and academic material, and from an underrepresented corner of the world. Great picture.
J Milburn (
talk) 12:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak Support. Detail/image quality could be better considering this is a very bog-standard composition and very easy to reproduce, but as mentioned, it's underrepresented and sneaks over the line IMO.
Ðiliff«»(Talk) 17:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment. The EV of the photo would be improved if there were a way to include a size reference (such as a person or a horse near the wall, so that the viewer can get a sense of the size of the subject).
Spikebrennan (
talk) 18:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support -- Stunning in a bleak sort of way. Beautiful shot.
JBarta (
talk) 08:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Nice photograph.
Aequo (
talk) 07:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support The quality is pretty solid and it is a great representation. ~
Arjun 14:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support Per composition and great encyclopedic quality (remotel historical jewel).
Materialscientist (
talk) 08:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose It's hard to estimate the building's size and the sky is noisy and there's some CA on the edges of the fortress.--
Someone35 17:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - high encyclopaedic value. There are some minor technical issues, but it's a FP on Commons. --
Xijky (
talk) 17:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Support There's a door for size reference (and FYI the building is 35m x 35m x the WP page doesn't mention the height).
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 08:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Qasr Kharana in Jordan.jpg --
Makeemlighter (
talk) 23:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply