- Reason
- Restitch to fix some problems in the sky that diliff spotted in the original. I've also changed projections to make the actual front door more visible in the frame.
- Articles this image appears in
- Parliament House, Canberra, Australia, Australian Landmarks
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator -- Noodle snacks ( talk) 07:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- oppose I like this picture an I like pictures made in the blue hour especially. But sadly there are a few points that disturb the good impression: the picture composition seems to me not harmonically. The EV of this File:Parliament House, Canberra, Pano jjron 25.9.2008-edit1.jpg pic is better because you get a better imagination of the exceptional architecture of this building. And last: the sharpness of this pic is not as good as it good be. Noodle snacks hat shoot much better pics. – Wladyslaw ( talk) 08:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty, but in terms of enc value I do not see this being an improvement over the daytime shot of the same building that was just featured here. (nothing personal, but this is an example for my unfriendly rant on Mainpage talk: an image contribution which adds only to articles that are already relatively well illustrated) --
Dschwen
14:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is in a number of articles that the other isn't and it was in parliament house first. Noodle snacks ( talk) 05:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- jjron ( talk) 07:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Restitch to fix some problems in the sky that diliff spotted in the original. I've also changed projections to make the actual front door more visible in the frame.
- Articles this image appears in
- Parliament House, Canberra, Australia, Australian Landmarks
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator -- Noodle snacks ( talk) 07:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- oppose I like this picture an I like pictures made in the blue hour especially. But sadly there are a few points that disturb the good impression: the picture composition seems to me not harmonically. The EV of this File:Parliament House, Canberra, Pano jjron 25.9.2008-edit1.jpg pic is better because you get a better imagination of the exceptional architecture of this building. And last: the sharpness of this pic is not as good as it good be. Noodle snacks hat shoot much better pics. – Wladyslaw ( talk) 08:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty, but in terms of enc value I do not see this being an improvement over the daytime shot of the same building that was just featured here. (nothing personal, but this is an example for my unfriendly rant on Mainpage talk: an image contribution which adds only to articles that are already relatively well illustrated) --
Dschwen
14:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is in a number of articles that the other isn't and it was in parliament house first. Noodle snacks ( talk) 05:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- jjron ( talk) 07:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)