Nice bokeh, but the noise from shooting at ISO 1600 (needed for such a wide aperture) masks some of the detail. Haven't made my mind up yet.
MER-C 11:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose – texture-like artifacts on the bokeh on the lower third of the image (perhaps noise related!?).
Bammesk (
talk) 03:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Fixed - sharpening tool went a bit wonky on the background.
JJ Harrison (
talk) 20:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Good, much better. I agree with MER-C, it is noisy and the noise shows in some areas, for example the underbelly. Good composition though. Weak support because of noise.
Bammesk (
talk) 01:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support - resolution goes some way towards compensating for noise.
MER-C 13:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. Nice at small image sizes but I don't like the bokeh on the mother's pouch, haunch, and underside. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 05:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Nice bokeh, but the noise from shooting at ISO 1600 (needed for such a wide aperture) masks some of the detail. Haven't made my mind up yet.
MER-C 11:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose – texture-like artifacts on the bokeh on the lower third of the image (perhaps noise related!?).
Bammesk (
talk) 03:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Fixed - sharpening tool went a bit wonky on the background.
JJ Harrison (
talk) 20:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Good, much better. I agree with MER-C, it is noisy and the noise shows in some areas, for example the underbelly. Good composition though. Weak support because of noise.
Bammesk (
talk) 01:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak support - resolution goes some way towards compensating for noise.
MER-C 13:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. Nice at small image sizes but I don't like the bokeh on the mother's pouch, haunch, and underside. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 05:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)reply