This is not a "temple". It is one of the four tower built by Kempegowda in the 17th Century. Hindu worshippers just go there for some reason. --
Muhammad(talk)09:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The towers are very notable and the image's usage in
Kempe Gowda I is in my opinion a vvery significant part of the article, being the only image there. Also, the towers is one of the most famous monuments in Lalbagh. No need to apologize however, you have the right to an opinion and I respect that. --
Muhammad(talk)12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. Very nice composition, but the tower seems a bit out of focus towards the top, which is disappointing. I'm not entirely certain about this, because the picture is only 1067 pixels high and the tower occupies a small proportion of the image. Since the tower is the main subject of the picture, I'd like to see a bigger and sharper image so that it can be seen in detail.
NotFromUtrecht (
talk)
15:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
This is not a "temple". It is one of the four tower built by Kempegowda in the 17th Century. Hindu worshippers just go there for some reason. --
Muhammad(talk)09:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The towers are very notable and the image's usage in
Kempe Gowda I is in my opinion a vvery significant part of the article, being the only image there. Also, the towers is one of the most famous monuments in Lalbagh. No need to apologize however, you have the right to an opinion and I respect that. --
Muhammad(talk)12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose. Very nice composition, but the tower seems a bit out of focus towards the top, which is disappointing. I'm not entirely certain about this, because the picture is only 1067 pixels high and the tower occupies a small proportion of the image. Since the tower is the main subject of the picture, I'd like to see a bigger and sharper image so that it can be seen in detail.
NotFromUtrecht (
talk)
15:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply