From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cheetah cub close-up

Original - A close-up view of a Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus cub.
Edit 2 Cropped to per Durova's suggestion
Reason
Good quality, EV and interesting IMO
Articles this image appears in
Cheetah
Creator
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
  • Support as nominator -- Muhammad (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Comment What would you think of a less centered crop that kept the cub's back and placed the face at right? Seems like a good instance to use the rule of thirds. Durova 284 16:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
    • Agreed, the square image doesn't look as good as one that crops the right side while keeping the back. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
      • I will remove the square edit and put up another one as you suggested by tomorrow. -- Muhammad (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support Took the liberty of a black point adjustment. Shows the mantle mentioned in the article well, so a head shot has definite EV. Noodle snacks ( talk) 11:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
    • Yeah, Muhammad, I think perhaps your monitor might need an adjustment, since the last couple of images have seemed slightly overexposed/lacking contrast. This one isn't as noticable as the boy on the bicycle though IMO. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
      • Yeah probably since I am on a different computer and monitor now. Thanks -- Muhammad (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
        • Diliff's edit looks wonderful on my system. That plus the crop and this will really be a winner. Good capture. :) Durova 285 21:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Edit 2 Uploaded -- Muhammad (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support edit 2 :) Durova 285 05:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support edit 2. Original is very good, but since the foliage in the background is not in focus and doesn’t give any kind of geographical indicators, I support the picture that makes the cub the main focus. Normally, I would support the picture that not only shows the animal, but also any of its natural habitat in the greatest detail. Zulualpha ( talk) 14:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Promoted File:Cheetah_cub_close-up_edit2.jpg -- Seddσn talk| WikimediaUK 01:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cheetah cub close-up

Original - A close-up view of a Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus cub.
Edit 2 Cropped to per Durova's suggestion
Reason
Good quality, EV and interesting IMO
Articles this image appears in
Cheetah
Creator
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
  • Support as nominator -- Muhammad (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Comment What would you think of a less centered crop that kept the cub's back and placed the face at right? Seems like a good instance to use the rule of thirds. Durova 284 16:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
    • Agreed, the square image doesn't look as good as one that crops the right side while keeping the back. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
      • I will remove the square edit and put up another one as you suggested by tomorrow. -- Muhammad (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support Took the liberty of a black point adjustment. Shows the mantle mentioned in the article well, so a head shot has definite EV. Noodle snacks ( talk) 11:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
    • Yeah, Muhammad, I think perhaps your monitor might need an adjustment, since the last couple of images have seemed slightly overexposed/lacking contrast. This one isn't as noticable as the boy on the bicycle though IMO. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
      • Yeah probably since I am on a different computer and monitor now. Thanks -- Muhammad (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
        • Diliff's edit looks wonderful on my system. That plus the crop and this will really be a winner. Good capture. :) Durova 285 21:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Edit 2 Uploaded -- Muhammad (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support edit 2 :) Durova 285 05:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Support edit 2. Original is very good, but since the foliage in the background is not in focus and doesn’t give any kind of geographical indicators, I support the picture that makes the cub the main focus. Normally, I would support the picture that not only shows the animal, but also any of its natural habitat in the greatest detail. Zulualpha ( talk) 14:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Promoted File:Cheetah_cub_close-up_edit2.jpg -- Seddσn talk| WikimediaUK 01:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook