Weak opposeComment The DOV is acceptable, as it is a very tiny animal. However, it only has one antennae. Unlike the other images of insects you have taken that have missing body parts, this one is the most distracting. I will have to think about this one... ZooFari16:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)reply
In all the cases species could not be identified because not much research has been done about these species. Those who identified them to this level, even asked me to send them samples of the species so they could further their research. SO IMO this is as good as it gets, and EV is definitely there. --
Muhammad(talk)06:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak support EV high (if the people who are IDing it want samples) and DOF pretty good, but not perfect for something so small.
Terri G (
talk)
17:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak opposeComment The DOV is acceptable, as it is a very tiny animal. However, it only has one antennae. Unlike the other images of insects you have taken that have missing body parts, this one is the most distracting. I will have to think about this one... ZooFari16:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)reply
In all the cases species could not be identified because not much research has been done about these species. Those who identified them to this level, even asked me to send them samples of the species so they could further their research. SO IMO this is as good as it gets, and EV is definitely there. --
Muhammad(talk)06:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak support EV high (if the people who are IDing it want samples) and DOF pretty good, but not perfect for something so small.
Terri G (
talk)
17:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply