- Reason
- Technically very good and very high EV
- Articles this image appears in
- Apricot
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator -- Fir0002 10:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Avala ( talk) 11:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Lemon martini ( talk) 12:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 18:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yummy, good EV. Makeemlighter ( talk) 19:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Mmmm... It's like Malatya apricot. -- DsMurat talk 23:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I just don't think that the photographing of a common everyday object on a white background is FP material. Sure it's sharp and well exposed, but once you are set up you can switch in and out thousands of subjects that will all be sharp and well lit but does that make them interesting to have on the front page? Hope you see my point, it's nothing against the images themselves, but where does it end, will we have an FP fruit and veg month with a different one on every day?! I don't see people rushing to read Apricot when seeing this. I think there is strong encyclopedic merit to seeing the fruit attached to its tree as well/instead. Mfield ( talk) 01:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support well done. — Aitias // discussion 19:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Cacophony ( talk) 02:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. The only thing I'd add is a size reference. Spikebrennan ( talk) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Apricot and cross section.jpg MER-C 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Technically very good and very high EV
- Articles this image appears in
- Apricot
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator -- Fir0002 10:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Avala ( talk) 11:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Lemon martini ( talk) 12:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 18:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yummy, good EV. Makeemlighter ( talk) 19:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support Mmmm... It's like Malatya apricot. -- DsMurat talk 23:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I just don't think that the photographing of a common everyday object on a white background is FP material. Sure it's sharp and well exposed, but once you are set up you can switch in and out thousands of subjects that will all be sharp and well lit but does that make them interesting to have on the front page? Hope you see my point, it's nothing against the images themselves, but where does it end, will we have an FP fruit and veg month with a different one on every day?! I don't see people rushing to read Apricot when seeing this. I think there is strong encyclopedic merit to seeing the fruit attached to its tree as well/instead. Mfield ( talk) 01:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support well done. — Aitias // discussion 19:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Cacophony ( talk) 02:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. The only thing I'd add is a size reference. Spikebrennan ( talk) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Apricot and cross section.jpg MER-C 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)