Support - last one that I reviewed earlier (and it for today). I like this, but I think others may not. The positioning is good, and the eye is drawn in and up along the flower. The upper right and upper left was a bit distracting and didn't really seem the best. However, I think it has good encyclopedic value.
Ottava Rima (
talk) 18:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Support I like this picture. It seems that the right side is a little darker than the left. I personally feel this gives the flower a “real” feeling (as if you are looking at it with the naked eye vs. in a photograph) and helps with the artistic quality. Great resolution and color as well. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Zulualpha (
talk •
contribs) 14:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Support beautiful image and high EV.--
Caspian blue 13:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Anopterus glandulosus.jpg --wadester16 03:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support - last one that I reviewed earlier (and it for today). I like this, but I think others may not. The positioning is good, and the eye is drawn in and up along the flower. The upper right and upper left was a bit distracting and didn't really seem the best. However, I think it has good encyclopedic value.
Ottava Rima (
talk) 18:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Support I like this picture. It seems that the right side is a little darker than the left. I personally feel this gives the flower a “real” feeling (as if you are looking at it with the naked eye vs. in a photograph) and helps with the artistic quality. Great resolution and color as well. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Zulualpha (
talk •
contribs) 14:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Support beautiful image and high EV.--
Caspian blue 13:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Anopterus glandulosus.jpg --wadester16 03:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)reply