comment yes it's professional and informative (like any other maps), but the question is whether it's amazingly special or encyclopedic that it should be a FP. --
Vircabutar17:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
If "any other map" is professional and informative, I'll show you something drawn on a cocktail napkin. This map was promoted on a 6-1 vote a scant ten months ago. Its creator took suggestions from users to make a good map better. The craftsmanship is enough for me to recommend keeping it as an FP. Perhaps the addition of anthropomorphic clouds with puffy cheeks supplying wind at the four corners and drawing sea dragons off the edges would increase the "wow" factor. --
Bagginz16:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist. It doesn't matter who made this...it's still a map, and I don't think there's anything about this map that makes it good enough to be a FP. --
Joniscool9815:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Agree with Melburnian - very well made, and illustrates a confluence of locations of interest (particularly Area 51, Yucca Mountain, and early atomic testing range) - not "nothing special". --
Davepape03:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist. Delisting does not mean deleting. This is not a vote about whether Wikipedia should have maps or not -- "wow factor" matters, amongst other things. --
Moondigger19:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply
comment yes it's professional and informative (like any other maps), but the question is whether it's amazingly special or encyclopedic that it should be a FP. --
Vircabutar17:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
If "any other map" is professional and informative, I'll show you something drawn on a cocktail napkin. This map was promoted on a 6-1 vote a scant ten months ago. Its creator took suggestions from users to make a good map better. The craftsmanship is enough for me to recommend keeping it as an FP. Perhaps the addition of anthropomorphic clouds with puffy cheeks supplying wind at the four corners and drawing sea dragons off the edges would increase the "wow" factor. --
Bagginz16:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist. It doesn't matter who made this...it's still a map, and I don't think there's anything about this map that makes it good enough to be a FP. --
Joniscool9815:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Agree with Melburnian - very well made, and illustrates a confluence of locations of interest (particularly Area 51, Yucca Mountain, and early atomic testing range) - not "nothing special". --
Davepape03:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Delist. Delisting does not mean deleting. This is not a vote about whether Wikipedia should have maps or not -- "wow factor" matters, amongst other things. --
Moondigger19:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply