- Reason
- Because it is catchy, portrays a beautiful of Islamabad, Pakistan and Islam (all of who are highly misunderstood in general terms), and depicts pure majesty.
- Articles this image appears in
- Faisal_Mosque, Haze#Obscuration
- Creator
- Raaid
- Support as nominator -- Raaid ( talk) 10:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Erm... for the obvious reason of not being able to see anything -- Childzy ¤ Talk 10:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Far too misty. Yeah, you may feel that that gives it character, but FPs are about encyclopedic value, not character and emotion. Your caption is also a little on the poetic side... We're an encyclopedia, not a novel. J Milburn ( talk) 18:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose pet childzy.-- Avala ( talk) 22:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As mentioned above, it's not a clear picture at all, and the caption makes it sound like you're writing a poem rather than a section of factual text. Silvestra ( talk) 23:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose You have to be kidding with this nomination. -- mcshadypl T C 17:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Catchy?! You can't see anything that would "catch" you... No chance suggest speedy close?! (amazed no-one has done this yet...) Gazhiley ( talk) 09:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Added to Haze#Obscuration :) Kaldari ( talk) 23:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support per Kaldari. For an ideal illustration of haze, there should be a version taken on a day without haze, to compare with. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 21:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 23:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Because it is catchy, portrays a beautiful of Islamabad, Pakistan and Islam (all of who are highly misunderstood in general terms), and depicts pure majesty.
- Articles this image appears in
- Faisal_Mosque, Haze#Obscuration
- Creator
- Raaid
- Support as nominator -- Raaid ( talk) 10:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Erm... for the obvious reason of not being able to see anything -- Childzy ¤ Talk 10:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Far too misty. Yeah, you may feel that that gives it character, but FPs are about encyclopedic value, not character and emotion. Your caption is also a little on the poetic side... We're an encyclopedia, not a novel. J Milburn ( talk) 18:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose pet childzy.-- Avala ( talk) 22:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As mentioned above, it's not a clear picture at all, and the caption makes it sound like you're writing a poem rather than a section of factual text. Silvestra ( talk) 23:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose You have to be kidding with this nomination. -- mcshadypl T C 17:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Catchy?! You can't see anything that would "catch" you... No chance suggest speedy close?! (amazed no-one has done this yet...) Gazhiley ( talk) 09:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Added to Haze#Obscuration :) Kaldari ( talk) 23:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support per Kaldari. For an ideal illustration of haze, there should be a version taken on a day without haze, to compare with. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 21:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 23:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)