Nominate and support. - Tewy 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm trying out the format of the
Bales of hay nomination by
Ravedave because I think it will make things a lot easier to tally, but others may think differently. Opinions are needed! Please leave a comment
here on what you think. Thanks. --Tewy 02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Subject: I think this an excellent photograph (size,
DOF, etc.) that illustrates the markings on a tiger's face.
Support Votes:
Nice clear shot showing details of a tiger face; adds to article. (BTW, for those that have so far voted on 'Bales of Hay' - note that under this format I do not need to restate my support/oppose as it is covered by the subheading; I just need the reason) --
jjron 10:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Preference for edit. --
jjron 09:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC). Make that Edit 2 - even better; in fact, lots better. --
jjron 11:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
A very exceptional image. The image is clear and well focused; I especially like how this rare Tiger is facing the camera. (Also: Can the voting format of this nomination be discontinued; its very busy) --
AJ24 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Does anyone else notice the overall red color cast? I uploaded an edit, which I support. howcheng {
chat} 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2 only. Great photo, but lacking in sharpness. Fixed that in Edit 2. Dislike the cold colors of Edit 1 --
Fir0002 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
In doubt about what it should look like, support original. Edit 2 looks oversharpened to me, and edit 1 too cold indeed. --
Bernard 03:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Good DOF, encyclopedic, composition, and the edit has good sharpness. --
Pharaoh Hound(talk) 18:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. nice color and composition. -
Ravedave 02:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Exceptional image. I also like the colors and composition. But how about a complete tiger? - anyway, this one is just good!
Mikeo 19:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Sharpness, color and just plain beauty. I really like this picture.
Oppose Votes:
What a shame, a lovely pic spoilt by the very slight blur -
Adrian Pingstone 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose - Aperture too wide open. Due to this most of the facial features are not in focus. WB in edit 1 seems to be closest to the original. Other two are too warm IMO. Great subject and composition. -
doniv 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral
reason - user
comment
Questions:
question - user
comment
Promoted Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpgMikeo 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Nominate and support. - Tewy 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
I'm trying out the format of the
Bales of hay nomination by
Ravedave because I think it will make things a lot easier to tally, but others may think differently. Opinions are needed! Please leave a comment
here on what you think. Thanks. --Tewy 02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Subject: I think this an excellent photograph (size,
DOF, etc.) that illustrates the markings on a tiger's face.
Support Votes:
Nice clear shot showing details of a tiger face; adds to article. (BTW, for those that have so far voted on 'Bales of Hay' - note that under this format I do not need to restate my support/oppose as it is covered by the subheading; I just need the reason) --
jjron 10:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Preference for edit. --
jjron 09:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC). Make that Edit 2 - even better; in fact, lots better. --
jjron 11:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
A very exceptional image. The image is clear and well focused; I especially like how this rare Tiger is facing the camera. (Also: Can the voting format of this nomination be discontinued; its very busy) --
AJ24 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Does anyone else notice the overall red color cast? I uploaded an edit, which I support. howcheng {
chat} 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2 only. Great photo, but lacking in sharpness. Fixed that in Edit 2. Dislike the cold colors of Edit 1 --
Fir0002 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
In doubt about what it should look like, support original. Edit 2 looks oversharpened to me, and edit 1 too cold indeed. --
Bernard 03:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Good DOF, encyclopedic, composition, and the edit has good sharpness. --
Pharaoh Hound(talk) 18:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. nice color and composition. -
Ravedave 02:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Exceptional image. I also like the colors and composition. But how about a complete tiger? - anyway, this one is just good!
Mikeo 19:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit 2. Sharpness, color and just plain beauty. I really like this picture.
Oppose Votes:
What a shame, a lovely pic spoilt by the very slight blur -
Adrian Pingstone 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose - Aperture too wide open. Due to this most of the facial features are not in focus. WB in edit 1 seems to be closest to the original. Other two are too warm IMO. Great subject and composition. -
doniv 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral
reason - user
comment
Questions:
question - user
comment
Promoted Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpgMikeo 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)reply