From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Facial Markings, Siberian Tiger

Facial markings on a Siberian tiger.
Edit: Color-corrected.
Edit 2, minor color correction, sharpening
  • Nominate and support. - Tewy 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm trying out the format of the Bales of hay nomination by Ravedave because I think it will make things a lot easier to tally, but others may think differently. Opinions are needed! Please leave a comment here on what you think. Thanks. -- Tewy 02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Creator: Crushinator
  • Nominator: Tewy
  • Date Submitted: 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Subject: I think this an excellent photograph (size, DOF, etc.) that illustrates the markings on a tiger's face.
  • Support Votes:
  1. Nice clear shot showing details of a tiger face; adds to article. (BTW, for those that have so far voted on 'Bales of Hay' - note that under this format I do not need to restate my support/oppose as it is covered by the subheading; I just need the reason) -- jjron 10:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Preference for edit. -- jjron 09:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC). Make that Edit 2 - even better; in fact, lots better. -- jjron 11:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. A very exceptional image. The image is clear and well focused; I especially like how this rare Tiger is facing the camera. (Also: Can the voting format of this nomination be discontinued; its very busy) -- AJ24 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Does anyone else notice the overall red color cast? I uploaded an edit, which I support. howch e ng { chat} 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Edit 2 only. Great photo, but lacking in sharpness. Fixed that in Edit 2. Dislike the cold colors of Edit 1 -- Fir0002 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. In doubt about what it should look like, support original. Edit 2 looks oversharpened to me, and edit 1 too cold indeed. -- Bernard 03:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Edit 2. Good DOF, encyclopedic, composition, and the edit has good sharpness. -- Pharaoh Hound (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Edit 2. -- Vircabutar 02:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Edit 2. nice color and composition. - Ravedave 02:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Edit 2. Exceptional image. I also like the colors and composition. But how about a complete tiger? - anyway, this one is just good! Mikeo 19:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Edit 2. Sharpness, color and just plain beauty. I really like this picture.
  • Oppose Votes:
  1. What a shame, a lovely pic spoilt by the very slight blur - Adrian Pingstone 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Weak oppose - Aperture too wide open. Due to this most of the facial features are not in focus. WB in edit 1 seems to be closest to the original. Other two are too warm IMO. Great subject and composition. - doniv 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Neutral
  1. reason - user
    comment
  • Questions:
  • question - user
    comment

Promoted Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpg Mikeo 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Facial Markings, Siberian Tiger

Facial markings on a Siberian tiger.
Edit: Color-corrected.
Edit 2, minor color correction, sharpening
  • Nominate and support. - Tewy 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm trying out the format of the Bales of hay nomination by Ravedave because I think it will make things a lot easier to tally, but others may think differently. Opinions are needed! Please leave a comment here on what you think. Thanks. -- Tewy 02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Creator: Crushinator
  • Nominator: Tewy
  • Date Submitted: 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Subject: I think this an excellent photograph (size, DOF, etc.) that illustrates the markings on a tiger's face.
  • Support Votes:
  1. Nice clear shot showing details of a tiger face; adds to article. (BTW, for those that have so far voted on 'Bales of Hay' - note that under this format I do not need to restate my support/oppose as it is covered by the subheading; I just need the reason) -- jjron 10:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Preference for edit. -- jjron 09:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC). Make that Edit 2 - even better; in fact, lots better. -- jjron 11:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. A very exceptional image. The image is clear and well focused; I especially like how this rare Tiger is facing the camera. (Also: Can the voting format of this nomination be discontinued; its very busy) -- AJ24 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Does anyone else notice the overall red color cast? I uploaded an edit, which I support. howch e ng { chat} 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Edit 2 only. Great photo, but lacking in sharpness. Fixed that in Edit 2. Dislike the cold colors of Edit 1 -- Fir0002 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. In doubt about what it should look like, support original. Edit 2 looks oversharpened to me, and edit 1 too cold indeed. -- Bernard 03:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Edit 2. Good DOF, encyclopedic, composition, and the edit has good sharpness. -- Pharaoh Hound (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Edit 2. -- Vircabutar 02:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Edit 2. nice color and composition. - Ravedave 02:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Edit 2. Exceptional image. I also like the colors and composition. But how about a complete tiger? - anyway, this one is just good! Mikeo 19:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Edit 2. Sharpness, color and just plain beauty. I really like this picture.
  • Oppose Votes:
  1. What a shame, a lovely pic spoilt by the very slight blur - Adrian Pingstone 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. Weak oppose - Aperture too wide open. Due to this most of the facial features are not in focus. WB in edit 1 seems to be closest to the original. Other two are too warm IMO. Great subject and composition. - doniv 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Neutral
  1. reason - user
    comment
  • Questions:
  • question - user
    comment

Promoted Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpg Mikeo 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook