Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2013 at 19:09:12 (UTC)
Original – General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
Reason
I previously nominated this image as part of a set. The set didn't get a five vote consensus but I hope this image can get consensus as a stand-alone nomination.
Support I think this is a very good image. While I dislike the sun glare on the canopy, if it were not there then the jet would not be properly illuminated by the sun. Physics can be annoying sometimes.
Rreagan007 (
talk)
03:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support I opposed it last time because of the cockpit glass glare, then I saw this image on Commons and abstained from voting but it really did give me a chance to think about it again, and really this image is the only one of an F-16 that actually shows the plane clearly, really well, and without fancy paint jobs. Also, this image works better by itself than as a set like last time. So full speed ahead! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies20:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2013 at 19:09:12 (UTC)
Original – General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
Reason
I previously nominated this image as part of a set. The set didn't get a five vote consensus but I hope this image can get consensus as a stand-alone nomination.
Support I think this is a very good image. While I dislike the sun glare on the canopy, if it were not there then the jet would not be properly illuminated by the sun. Physics can be annoying sometimes.
Rreagan007 (
talk)
03:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Support I opposed it last time because of the cockpit glass glare, then I saw this image on Commons and abstained from voting but it really did give me a chance to think about it again, and really this image is the only one of an F-16 that actually shows the plane clearly, really well, and without fancy paint jobs. Also, this image works better by itself than as a set like last time. So full speed ahead! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies20:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)reply