Comment: A really interesting picture, but the article was created by a now-banned user who seems to have had a poor grasp of English and/or botany. I've given the article a quick copyedit, but, frankly, it may be best to just start over...
J Milburn (
talk)
23:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Rare to have a plant image with a bit of wow like this. The fill size image is very soft, but I guess the camera's sensor is just far out-resolving the lens placed on it, and there is more than acceptable detail.
JJ Harrison (
talk)
06:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Very nice image. This image can and should stand alone regardless of the uploader. If the description page, caption, or article placement needs work then there's no reason that it can't be a community effort and/or taken on by someone else. Cat-fivetc ----
07:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Comment: A really interesting picture, but the article was created by a now-banned user who seems to have had a poor grasp of English and/or botany. I've given the article a quick copyedit, but, frankly, it may be best to just start over...
J Milburn (
talk)
23:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Rare to have a plant image with a bit of wow like this. The fill size image is very soft, but I guess the camera's sensor is just far out-resolving the lens placed on it, and there is more than acceptable detail.
JJ Harrison (
talk)
06:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Support Very nice image. This image can and should stand alone regardless of the uploader. If the description page, caption, or article placement needs work then there's no reason that it can't be a community effort and/or taken on by someone else. Cat-fivetc ----
07:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)reply